![]() |
http://icanhas.cheezburger.com/ |
Friday, November 28, 2014
Friday, November 21, 2014
Book Review: Black Cherry Blues
James Lee Burke
1989
Awards: Edgar
Rating: ★ ★ – – –
This
book was well-paced and suspenseful. The core plot was good. It wasn’t
cheap or sloppy or half-heartedly put together. Otherwise, however, it
was pretty much a disappointment.
The descriptions of the Louisiana and Montana landscapes, cuisine, and people seemed self-conscious and smug. So did the main character’s constant running and weightlifting. Conversations were full of phrases that I think were supposed to be clever but just came out as annoying. The treatment of race was weird. And the hero had a streak of violence in him that seriously undercut his indignation about violent behavior in others.
The story is about a former cop, Dave Robicheaux, who lives on the Louisiana coast making a modest living running a bait shop and fishing boat rental business. His inner circle consists of two people who help him out around the shop and his house, and an adopted daughter, Alafair, from El Salvador. He is continually haunted by dreams of both the Vietnam war and his dead wife, who was killed by gangsters getting revenge on him for some past escapade.
Aside from the dreams, all is basically well with Robicheaux’s life until he bumps into an old friend: a drug-addicted, down-on-his-luck former rock-and-roll star now working as a leaseman for an oil company. His friend asks him to investigate a conversation that he overheard between two co-workers talking about how they killed a couple guys up in Montana. Before he knows it, Robicheaux is sucked up into a web of danger and intrigue involving mobsters, hired hit men, hot-blooded Salish Indian women, and, of course, winsome elementary school principals who have such incredible generosity they don’t mind that he keeps dumping his kid on them when he needs to go beat up a guy or confront a mobster or otherwise put himself in a life-threatening situation.
In the course of his investigation, Robicheaux has to travel from Louisiana to Montana, giving the author plenty of opportunity to show his intimate knowledge of both (Burke lives in Louisiana and spends a lot of vacation time in Montana). Sometimes an author will bring you into a country with them, sharing it with you, making you feel like you understand it too (as in The Healer’s War, Dance Hall of the Dead, or The Lingala Code). But Burke’s descriptions mostly came off as either braggadocio or as inside jokes I wasn’t privy to. Also, although his descriptions of scenery are quite detailed, I nevertheless found it strangely hard to picture.
I had a bit of a hard time with how Burke portrays black people in the book. Robicheaux is white. About the black man and woman who work for him (whose poor grammar he is constantly making fun of), he says: “I was always amazed by the illusion of white supremacy in southern society, since more often than not our homes were dominated and run by people of color.” I think this is supposed to come across as a compliment, or perhaps wryly funny, but, since he shows no real understanding of what his employees are like as people, it comes across as a tad patronizing. When push comes to shove, who’s really in charge of that bait shop? This is also the only time in the book he calls them anything but “Negro.” I might be a prude, and I might not be understanding the cultural context in Louisiana, but I’m not sure that “Negro” is the absolutely best term for 1989.
Robicheaux is a recovering alcoholic, but I found his recovery very glossy. It felt more like a gimmick than an integral part of his character. He goes through a dry drunk complete with fever and tremors one day, and then the next day goes to get an ice cream cone with his daughter like nothing ever happened. He is also very smug about abstinence with his rock-and-roller friend, who still struggles with self-control every day. It is a pale shadow of Lawrence Block’s excellent Matt Scudder novels, another detective series with an alcoholic lead, which, fortunately, I’ve had a chance to rave about already.
And, finally, Robicheaux is self-righteous and
judgmental
about the violence of the mobsters he’s investigating, but he himself
has horrifyingly violent episodes. At one point, for example, he
ambushes two goons who threatened the life of his daughter and spends
probably fifteen minutes beating them within an inch of their lives with
a five-foot length of chain. It doesn’t fit. If you’re going to be an
anti-hero, you can’t go around on the one hand talking like you’re a
saint and then on the other hand be eagerly and gratuitously bloody in
your revenge. You need to take care of your problems with reluctant but
necessary dispatch.
An earlier version of this review originally appeared on Cheeze Blog.
1989
Awards: Edgar
Rating: ★ ★ – – –

The descriptions of the Louisiana and Montana landscapes, cuisine, and people seemed self-conscious and smug. So did the main character’s constant running and weightlifting. Conversations were full of phrases that I think were supposed to be clever but just came out as annoying. The treatment of race was weird. And the hero had a streak of violence in him that seriously undercut his indignation about violent behavior in others.
The story is about a former cop, Dave Robicheaux, who lives on the Louisiana coast making a modest living running a bait shop and fishing boat rental business. His inner circle consists of two people who help him out around the shop and his house, and an adopted daughter, Alafair, from El Salvador. He is continually haunted by dreams of both the Vietnam war and his dead wife, who was killed by gangsters getting revenge on him for some past escapade.
Aside from the dreams, all is basically well with Robicheaux’s life until he bumps into an old friend: a drug-addicted, down-on-his-luck former rock-and-roll star now working as a leaseman for an oil company. His friend asks him to investigate a conversation that he overheard between two co-workers talking about how they killed a couple guys up in Montana. Before he knows it, Robicheaux is sucked up into a web of danger and intrigue involving mobsters, hired hit men, hot-blooded Salish Indian women, and, of course, winsome elementary school principals who have such incredible generosity they don’t mind that he keeps dumping his kid on them when he needs to go beat up a guy or confront a mobster or otherwise put himself in a life-threatening situation.
In the course of his investigation, Robicheaux has to travel from Louisiana to Montana, giving the author plenty of opportunity to show his intimate knowledge of both (Burke lives in Louisiana and spends a lot of vacation time in Montana). Sometimes an author will bring you into a country with them, sharing it with you, making you feel like you understand it too (as in The Healer’s War, Dance Hall of the Dead, or The Lingala Code). But Burke’s descriptions mostly came off as either braggadocio or as inside jokes I wasn’t privy to. Also, although his descriptions of scenery are quite detailed, I nevertheless found it strangely hard to picture.
I had a bit of a hard time with how Burke portrays black people in the book. Robicheaux is white. About the black man and woman who work for him (whose poor grammar he is constantly making fun of), he says: “I was always amazed by the illusion of white supremacy in southern society, since more often than not our homes were dominated and run by people of color.” I think this is supposed to come across as a compliment, or perhaps wryly funny, but, since he shows no real understanding of what his employees are like as people, it comes across as a tad patronizing. When push comes to shove, who’s really in charge of that bait shop? This is also the only time in the book he calls them anything but “Negro.” I might be a prude, and I might not be understanding the cultural context in Louisiana, but I’m not sure that “Negro” is the absolutely best term for 1989.
Robicheaux is a recovering alcoholic, but I found his recovery very glossy. It felt more like a gimmick than an integral part of his character. He goes through a dry drunk complete with fever and tremors one day, and then the next day goes to get an ice cream cone with his daughter like nothing ever happened. He is also very smug about abstinence with his rock-and-roller friend, who still struggles with self-control every day. It is a pale shadow of Lawrence Block’s excellent Matt Scudder novels, another detective series with an alcoholic lead, which, fortunately, I’ve had a chance to rave about already.
And, finally, Robicheaux is self-righteous and

An earlier version of this review originally appeared on Cheeze Blog.
Friday, November 14, 2014
Friday, November 7, 2014
Book Review: Helliconia Spring
Brian
W. Aldiss
1982
Awards:
Campbell
Nominations:
Nebula, Locus
Rating:
★ ★ – – –
SPOILER
ALERT
Sometimes
it seems to me that every lengthy science fiction novel published in the ‘50s
and ‘60s was promoted as “the greatest epic since The Lord of the Rings,” and that every lengthy science fiction
novel published in the ‘70s and ‘80s was promoted as “the greatest epic since Dune.”
Very
few of the books thus described actually measure up to either of these
standards. Helliconia Spring is a case in point, advertised on its back cover as “the most magnificent epic
since Dune.” It certainly is epic in
its ambition, but as for its magnificence, I beg to differ.
Helliconia
Spring is
set on Helliconia, an Earth-like planet orbiting a binary star system.
Helliconia circles its primary star once every 2,000 Earth years. During each of
these Helliconian years the planet suffers through a devastating, icy-cold
winter that is 600 Earth years long.
This means that the inhabitants are stuck
in a stultifying cycle: civilizations flourish and advance technologically
during the summers, but then any progress they make is wiped out when winter
comes; the cold drives them back to a hunter-gatherer existence, leaving them to scrape out
whatever kind of living they can.
The novel sweeps
across hundreds of Earth years, starting in the middle of one of these prolonged
winters and ending with the onset of spring. It mainly tells the life stories
of three principal patriarchs of the same family, several generations apart (but
there are plenty of digressions into other characters’ narratives along the way).
The
first of these patriarchs is Yuli, a nomadic hunter living deep in the heart of
winter. Yuli and his father are out on a hunting trip when they are attacked by
a band of the other intelligent beings living on Helliconia: the horned, furry,
goat-like, human-hating phagors. The phagors kill Yuli’s father but Yuli
himself escapes. Eventually Yuli finds his way to Pannoval, a huge and relatively
advanced but repressive underground city where he is adopted into a foster
family. He gets the best education Pannoval can give him and even becomes a
priest, but he never forgets his former life above ground. Eventually he runs
away from Pannoval with a few friends and makes his way back up to the surface
where he founds a new village, Oldorando.
The
story is then taken up many generations later with Yuli’s direct descendant “Little”
Yuli, who is the leader of the now much larger town of Oldorando. Little Yuli
gets pretty short shrift; he dies soon after he is introduced, and we learn more
about his life from the stories told by the citizens gathered at his funeral
rather than seeing events happen for ourselves. The main contribution Little
Yuli makes to the novel is that his death opens up a succession controversy;
his only child is a daughter (and everyone knows that women cannot rule), and his
only grandson, Laintal Ay, is too little to govern.
The
rest of the book is a frustratingly aimless recitation of Laintal Ay’s twisting,
turning early life story. He grows up under a series of interim town leaders,
none of whom are model citizens. He becomes a trusted lieutenant of one of
them, then falls out of favor; he falls in love and is rewarded, and then rebuffed; he goes on a
heart-stricken pilgrimage far away during which he contracts a horrible disease,
then he comes back.
I
started out optimistically at the beginning of this book, moderately bored but
hopeful that it would pick up steam, and ended up actively resentful at sitting
through meandering story lines with little resolution to them. Time really whips
along: people grow, marry, have children, and die, and you can barely keep
track of them (and barely want to). At one point, in just six pages, Oldorando changed from a
backwards agricultural settlement to a village that launched mounted raids on
other villages to a trade economy using metal currency.
There
are occasional tantalizing hints of more interesting things we could explore further—in
particular, an approaching phagor invasion, a woman who revolts against
traditional women’s work and founds an academy of learning, and an Earth observation
satellite hovering unseen above all the action—but we get no real long-term satisfaction from of
any of them.
I
think Lord of the Rings and Dune worked as epics because, even
though they are incredibly long and detailed, they also center on
distinctive, charismatic characters that I really grew to know and understand and often care about. Helliconia Spring, on the other hand, is
more of a dispassionate biblical litany, a string of names and places and
incidents happening to people to whom I felt no particular attachment.
The
tone isn’t helped by Aldiss’ somewhat formal prose and his frequent use of the passive
voice, as in “the Vakka had been bridged” and “his figure could be seen.” The
characters’ names also tend to be a little bit ridiculous, and are easy to
confuse with each other if you aren’t paying close enough attention. To wit:
Raynil Layan
Laintal Ay
Loil Bry
Loilanun
Eline Tal
Rol Sakil
Dol Sakil
Hrr-Brahl Yprt
Yhamm-Whrrmar
I
think I am probably more disappointed in this book than I might otherwise be
because I had higher expectations for Aldiss. His novella The Saliva Tree, which won the Nebula in 1965, was really very
good. It just may be that the epic is not his best format.
Friday, October 31, 2014
Friday, October 24, 2014
Book Review: The Laughing Policeman
Maj Sjöwall and Per Wahlöö
1970
Awards: Edgar
Rating: ★ ★ ★ – –
This book was an enjoyable combination of decent plot, good characters, and great style.
It is a murder mystery set in Stockholm. It sucks you in right away, starting with a pretty gripping description of the shooting of nine people on a double-decker bus late at night in a remote part of the city. Two less-than-enthusiastic patrolmen from the bordering suburb of Solna stumble across the bus first and trample all over the scene, eliminating many of the clues.
To make matters worse, one of the murdered passengers turns out to be an off-duty member of the homicide squad who had no discernable reason for being on that bus.

The case, naturally, becomes a red ball for the Stockholm P.D. and you spend the rest of the book watching the stressed-out detectives solve the crime.
It was neat to read a mystery set in Stockholm. I got to see not only the Swedish police but also a bit of Swedish culture from the inside. Stockholm becomes not an abstract, glamorous European destination but a big, real, gritty city. Northern and southern Swedish accents set peers apart and make them feel inferior. Americans start to look a little bit strange and foreign.
I liked that the team of Stockholm detectives is made up of distinctive, believable characters. You see the story from almost every detective’s point of view and you see how confused and frustrated they all are.
I also loved the writing style. The authors (a husband and wife team) use matter-of-fact, uncomplicated sentences that are just a little bit quirky. The book was originally written in Swedish but I don’t think it’s the translation to the English that makes the writing style so entertaining. This is the description of the patrol route the uninspired Solna patrolmen chose before they ran across the bus – a route designed to avoid running into anything that might actually require policing:
There were, however, a couple things about the book that were annoying. For one thing, sometimes key pieces of information would be withheld from me and then would be revealed by the policeman I’d been following without me even knowing that he’d been doing any extra investigation. I don’t mind surprises but I like at least knowing that there’s something I don’t know. This felt like my characters were sneaking around behind my back.
And, frankly, the motives of the culprit, some of the victims, and the dead policeman’s girlfriend, all of which were key to the plot, seemed a bit dicey and unrealistic.
An earlier version of this review originally appeared on Cheeze Blog.
1970
Awards: Edgar
Rating: ★ ★ ★ – –
This book was an enjoyable combination of decent plot, good characters, and great style.
It is a murder mystery set in Stockholm. It sucks you in right away, starting with a pretty gripping description of the shooting of nine people on a double-decker bus late at night in a remote part of the city. Two less-than-enthusiastic patrolmen from the bordering suburb of Solna stumble across the bus first and trample all over the scene, eliminating many of the clues.
To make matters worse, one of the murdered passengers turns out to be an off-duty member of the homicide squad who had no discernable reason for being on that bus.
The case, naturally, becomes a red ball for the Stockholm P.D. and you spend the rest of the book watching the stressed-out detectives solve the crime.
It was neat to read a mystery set in Stockholm. I got to see not only the Swedish police but also a bit of Swedish culture from the inside. Stockholm becomes not an abstract, glamorous European destination but a big, real, gritty city. Northern and southern Swedish accents set peers apart and make them feel inferior. Americans start to look a little bit strange and foreign.
I liked that the team of Stockholm detectives is made up of distinctive, believable characters. You see the story from almost every detective’s point of view and you see how confused and frustrated they all are.
I also loved the writing style. The authors (a husband and wife team) use matter-of-fact, uncomplicated sentences that are just a little bit quirky. The book was originally written in Swedish but I don’t think it’s the translation to the English that makes the writing style so entertaining. This is the description of the patrol route the uninspired Solna patrolmen chose before they ran across the bus – a route designed to avoid running into anything that might actually require policing:
“It was a brilliantly thought-out course, leading through areas which were almost guaranteed empty of people. They met not a single car the whole way and saw only two living creatures, first a cat and then another cat.”Often what the authors will do is start out with a really short sentence that has only basic information in it. Then they’ll repeat the sentence, making it a little bit longer by elaborating just a little bit. And then they’ll do that again… and again. Until after about five sentences, you have this really long sentence with all kinds of crazy detail in it that is a hundred times more informative than the original sentence. It’s like they’re reluctant to tell the story but can’t help letting it dribble out in spite of themselves.
There were, however, a couple things about the book that were annoying. For one thing, sometimes key pieces of information would be withheld from me and then would be revealed by the policeman I’d been following without me even knowing that he’d been doing any extra investigation. I don’t mind surprises but I like at least knowing that there’s something I don’t know. This felt like my characters were sneaking around behind my back.
And, frankly, the motives of the culprit, some of the victims, and the dead policeman’s girlfriend, all of which were key to the plot, seemed a bit dicey and unrealistic.
An earlier version of this review originally appeared on Cheeze Blog.
Friday, October 10, 2014
Book Review: A Cold Red Sunrise
Stuart M. Kaminsky
1989
Awards: Edgar
Rating: ★ ★ – – –
I really liked most of the characters and the setting of this book. But the main murder plot just wasn’t very gripping.
The story is set in the tiny town of Tumsk, Siberia. Police detective Rostnikov is sent from Moscow to investigate the murder of another detective who was killed while investigating the death of a little girl – the daughter of a dissident who is about to get deported to the west.
Rostnikov is extremely appealing; gruff and plainspoken. He is honest and works very hard but has run afoul of the KGB a couple times back in Moscow, so this is sort of a test for him. He has a very tall, unemotional, doggedly loyal assistant, Karpo, who is a little like Lurch from the Addams Family. The Party watchdogs are, of course, totally incompetent and full of bluster. I felt like all the townspeople were well-defined, down to the nervous old woman who serves the visiting policemen their food. The conversation was spare and direct.
Siberia itself also plays a great part in the book. Rostnikov is sent to Tumsk during the winter, so it is always ridiculously cold and the sun barely rises at all in the sky in the daytime. Snow is piled everywhere, several feet high. A snowplow (run by the Navy personnel manning the town’s weather station) clears the streets at 6:00 am every morning and serves as the town alarm clock. Most of the town’s residents are dissidents or skeptics or (like the incompetent Party watchdogs) rejects from Moscow of some kind. Everyone seems very much alone, isolated by the cold and the remote location.
The problem is that the murder story itself is a little simple and maybe a little tired. Rostnikov keeps all his information close to the vest, including from the reader, which is frustrating because you aren’t really able to make your own guesses (and thereby build up your suspense) from the evidence he uncovers. I do appreciate last-minute surprise revelations but in this book practically all the information you need comes out in the last ten pages.
It turned out that I did correctly guess who the murderer was, but mainly I just guessed that person because he/she seemed like the least likely suspect, and that’s who Agatha Christie teaches you to look out for. I still am not sure I really understand his/her motive.
Because of the plot issues, I was a bit surprised that this book won the Edgar. But the book did come out at the perfect time: the late 1980s, when the Soviet Union was in its final crumble. Kaminsky’s detective and his assistant both have integrity and are just trying to do their jobs, and yet–or maybe because of that–they both end up struggling in their own ways against the oppressive system they live in. They are very sympathetic characters for the end of the Cold War.
An earlier version of this review originally appeared on Cheeze Blog.
1989
Awards: Edgar
Rating: ★ ★ – – –

The story is set in the tiny town of Tumsk, Siberia. Police detective Rostnikov is sent from Moscow to investigate the murder of another detective who was killed while investigating the death of a little girl – the daughter of a dissident who is about to get deported to the west.
Rostnikov is extremely appealing; gruff and plainspoken. He is honest and works very hard but has run afoul of the KGB a couple times back in Moscow, so this is sort of a test for him. He has a very tall, unemotional, doggedly loyal assistant, Karpo, who is a little like Lurch from the Addams Family. The Party watchdogs are, of course, totally incompetent and full of bluster. I felt like all the townspeople were well-defined, down to the nervous old woman who serves the visiting policemen their food. The conversation was spare and direct.
Siberia itself also plays a great part in the book. Rostnikov is sent to Tumsk during the winter, so it is always ridiculously cold and the sun barely rises at all in the sky in the daytime. Snow is piled everywhere, several feet high. A snowplow (run by the Navy personnel manning the town’s weather station) clears the streets at 6:00 am every morning and serves as the town alarm clock. Most of the town’s residents are dissidents or skeptics or (like the incompetent Party watchdogs) rejects from Moscow of some kind. Everyone seems very much alone, isolated by the cold and the remote location.
The problem is that the murder story itself is a little simple and maybe a little tired. Rostnikov keeps all his information close to the vest, including from the reader, which is frustrating because you aren’t really able to make your own guesses (and thereby build up your suspense) from the evidence he uncovers. I do appreciate last-minute surprise revelations but in this book practically all the information you need comes out in the last ten pages.
It turned out that I did correctly guess who the murderer was, but mainly I just guessed that person because he/she seemed like the least likely suspect, and that’s who Agatha Christie teaches you to look out for. I still am not sure I really understand his/her motive.
Because of the plot issues, I was a bit surprised that this book won the Edgar. But the book did come out at the perfect time: the late 1980s, when the Soviet Union was in its final crumble. Kaminsky’s detective and his assistant both have integrity and are just trying to do their jobs, and yet–or maybe because of that–they both end up struggling in their own ways against the oppressive system they live in. They are very sympathetic characters for the end of the Cold War.
An earlier version of this review originally appeared on Cheeze Blog.
Friday, October 3, 2014
Clash of the Titans
In 1980, a book named Titan won the Locus award for best novel. In 2007, another book named Titan won the Campbell award for best novel. Herewith, I give you a comparison of the two.
Novel
|
Titan
|
Titan
|
Author
|
John Varley
|
Ben Bova
|
Year
Published
|
1979
|
2006
|
Award Won
|
Locus
|
Campbell
|
Stars
|
2
|
2
|
Plot Summary
|
Group of Earth scientists goes out to Saturn and gets swallowed up by giant alien orbital construct
|
Group of Earth scientists goes out to Saturn and gets swallowed up in convoluted melodrama
|
Ostensible
reason for main characters visiting Saturn
|
Scientific exploration and research
(investigating anomalies on Saturn’s moons)
|
Scientific research (mixed bag of atmospheric,
ring, and moon investigation)
|
Intended
duration of visit
|
Temporary
|
Permanent
|
Name
of spaceship
|
Ringmaster
|
Goddard
|
Percent
of book actually taking place on Titan
|
0%
|
20%
|
Snappy, male-sounding name of female spaceship captain main
character
|
Cirocco Jones
|
Pancho Lane
|
Female
main characters’ view of procreation
|
Determined to control their own
procreation; three have to have an abortion to do so
|
Determined to get the right to have children
in their space habitat; one has to run for chief administrator to do so
|
Forms
of life discovered by humans
|
Centaurs; winged humanoids; killer
mudfish; intelligent gas-filled blimps
|
|
Irritating
writing habits of author
|
Gratuitous use of palm-slapping, knuckle
biting, and lip chewing
|
Silly regional accents; gratuitous use of dipping of the chin
|
Friday, September 26, 2014
Book Review: Titan (by Ben Bova)
Ben Bova
Unfortunately, the science fiction parts of
this book are largely drowned out by the irritating, unlikeable characters and
the tiresome soap opera going on among them. Not to mention the tremendously awkward presentation of gender conflicts.
2006
Awards: Campbell
Rating: ★ ★ – – –
Before I begin trashing the plot and
characters of Ben Bova’s Titan, let
me say first that the parts of this book that were actually directly related to
science fiction are fine. Bova does a perfectly reasonable job of describing futuristic
capabilities of medical nanotechnology, the components of a space station
habitat, and the methane slush and smog on the surface of Titan. Not as great a
job as, say, Kim Stanley Robinson, but perfectly good.

In Titan,
a group of ten thousand people have all flown out together from Earth on the
spacecraft Goddard and are now living
in it in the orbit of Saturn. Their voyage has been funded by a coalition of
universities and is primarily meant for scientific research, but the Goddard also carries Earth exiles,
administrators, mechanics, and rich tourists interested in exploring the solar
system.
The book has a huge cast of characters, few
of whom have identifiably distinct personalities. And they are all introduced
rapid-fire in the first part of the book, so there is no real chance to get to
know any of them well. This is just one book in Bova’s multi-part “Grand Tour”
series of solar system exploration and it’s possible that some of these
characters would be more familiar and appealing to me if I had read the earlier installments
of that series, but I haven’t, and they aren’t.
If any characters can be said to be particularly
central to the plot, I guess it would be protagonist Pancho Lane and antagonist
Malcolm Eberly. Lane is the retired former CEO of a giant tech company and an
accomplished space pilot. She is on Goddard
partly because she’s there visiting her sister Holly, and partly because
she’s bored with life back on Earth. Eberly is the nauseatingly selfish and
manipulative chief administrator of the Goddard
habitat, and he is willing to do anything it takes to enhance his own
power.
For most of the book, the main dramatic
tension centers around Eberly’s run for reelection. He initially thinks he is a
shoe-in, since he promises untold wealth for everyone in the habitat if they
allow him to mine water from Saturn’s rings for export to other space outposts.
But he doesn’t count on two things:
(1) Pancho Lane teaming up with an
admiral, a stuntman, and a plucky group of scientists to try to prove that
there are living organisms in the rings of Saturn, which would prevent them
from being mined; and
(2) Pancho’s sister Holly Lane, who
decides to run against Eberly in the election.
There is also a good amount of time spent
on a secondary plotline about an exploratory probe sent to Titan. The probe goes
dead as soon as it gets to the moon’s surface, and the leader of the project,
Edouard Urbain, drives his staff over the edge of exhaustion trying to
reactivate it. This story had far more potential than the election melodrama,
but, unfortunately, nothing major plot-wise ever really came from it, so I sort of wondered what the point of it was.
No, unfortunately, far more time is spent not
on exploratory moon probes but on internal habitat politics and, in particular,
the grossly mishandled topic of zero population growth. The Goddard has limited space, so everyone on
it signed an agreement that they wouldn’t have any children on the flight out
to Saturn. Now that they have reached Saturn, however, they want to start
having babies. Eberly refuses to even talk about it, so Holly runs against him,
not because she thinks she has a prayer of winning, but just to force the
issue.
The debate quickly divides the habitat cleanly
down gender lines. Nearly 100% of all women aboard are apparently universally
in favor of and desperately in need of the unfettered production of children,
and nearly 100% of the men aboard, are at the very most, neutral on the topic,
if not actively against it.
Some women on the ship refuse to have sex
with their husbands until they agree to Holly’s platform—and their men, of
course, relent. Holly’s rallies are almost 100% women except for a few men who
have either been forced to come by their wives or who are there to cover it for
the media.
And her speeches are smugly described by
her supporters as “women’s issues,” even though population control in this
context is hardly only a women’s issue. People are motivated to reproduce—or not—for
a host of complex motives. There are plenty of men who want to have children.
There are plenty of women who don’t. There are people of both sexes who are unsure. I think
Bova thought that he was making a relevant cultural statement with this
presentation of the topic. I couldn’t decide whether it was actually offensive,
or just plain ridiculous.
Bova handles the writing of
competent women, and their relationships with men and between each other, pretty
badly in general. At one point, the head of the nanotech lab doesn’t want to re-assert
a request for something she needs for her work because she doesn’t want to be
thought of as a “nagging little woman.” At another point, two women—the head of
the biology department and the leader of the project to find life in the rings
of Saturn—can’t find a way to talk to each other professionally at first, but
at last bond like giggling schoolgirls over lunch talking about how to get a
man to like them.
And in another sparkling incident, one of
these same women, the biology department head, tries to convince Urbain to let
her work on a different project than his stuck probe. He refuses and she leaves
his office crying, where she bumps into the meek, shy head of the computer
science department. Her crying suddenly transforms the computer science head
into a paragon of assertiveness who marches into Urbain’s office and demands that he treat his
employees better. And then the biology department head and the computer science
head promptly start dating.
One other thing I can’t help mentioning is that
the sisters Holly and Pancho Lane have an incredibly annoying accent. One of
them (Holly) is the head of human resources for the habitat and is running for
chief administrator, and the other (Pancho) is a former head of a giant tech
company and an accomplished space pilot. And yet they have this accent in which
they use slang, jargon, and contractions in ways that make them sound like Valley
Girls. It’s hard to take someone seriously when their vocabulary is sprinkled
with f’real, c’mon, prob’ly, coupla, damfino, dontcha, jeeps, and terrif.
Okay, one more thing. Bova seems to be
preoccupied with the chin as an indicator of emotion. I counted six instances
where he had someone “dip” his or her “chin” to signify agreement (instead of, I
suppose, just nodding). There are also a couple of times where someone
scratches their chin to indicate confusion, and a couple times when people
tipped their chins in surprise. It is a habit worthy of the lip-biting of Cyteen.
Friday, September 12, 2014
Book Review: Titan (by John Varley)
John Varley
Unfortunately, the plot takes a turn for
the worse in the last third of the book when Captain Jones decides she wants
answers about what has happened to her crew, and that the only way to get those
answers is by taking an arduous, tedious, months-long trek up to the center of the
torus. I got exhausted by it long before the characters did. They would conquer
one obstacle and then would be presented with another five times more daunting,
including, at one point, a horrible rapist. Personally, I would have given up in
the first week and gone back to the calm grassy land with the nice centaur
people.
1979
Awards: Locus
Nominations: Nebula, Hugo
Nominations: Nebula, Hugo
Rating: ★ ★ – – –
SPOILER ALERT
At the beginning of John Varley’s Titan, a small group of seven astronauts
are headed out towards Saturn in the spaceship Ringmaster on an international mission of scientific exploration. Led
by the independent and strong-willed but also somewhat irritatingly insecure
Captain Cirocco Jones, it is a tight-knit crew with flexible romantic
arrangements: by the end of the voyage, almost every person has slept with almost
every other person of the opposite gender, and occasionally some people of the
same gender.
The story is pretty slow to get going.
During the first two chapters, which cover the voyage to Saturn, I was turned
off enough by the characters’ personalities, the impersonal games of sexual
musical chairs, and some of the author’s more annoying habits of prose that I
was ready to give up.
Fortunately, things got better for a while.
When the Ringmaster gets to Saturn, they
discover a huge object in orbit around the planet. At first they think it is an
undocumented moon, but as they get nearer it turns out to be an enormous,
rotating torus-shaped artificial construct. They fly in close to investigate,
their ship gets forcibly hauled in by a tentacled beast coming from the object,
and they all go unconscious.
They then go through a surreal period of mental
limbo after which they are all deposited in disparate places around the interior
rim of the torus, which turns out to be an enormous oxygen-rich habitat filled
with alien trees and grasses and animals. This is the best part of the book, as
the members of the crew reunite and try to prevent themselves from being eaten
by the native wildlife and killed by the indigenous sentient beings while they
figure out how to escape and get home.
It seems very much like a combination of two
earlier novels: Larry Niven’s Ringworld and
Philip José Farmer’s To Your Scattered Bodies Go. The torus is like a mini version of Ringworld in its artificiality,
its huge scale, the abruptly defined sections of night and day, and the variety
of environments and life forms. And
the characters’ rebirth inside it is reminiscent of the resurrection process
from Farmer’s book: they emerge into a strange raw environment completely naked
and hairless, and they have to rebuild their clothes, technology, and, in some
cases, memories from scratch. (And, like Farmer’s characters, they also even
eventually wind up traveling up a big central river in their own handmade
boats.)
It started to seem especially pointless when
they started downgrading the purpose behind the trek. Originally, they wanted
to figure out how to escape the torus—which they had by this time started
calling Gaea—and to get home. But later on they shift to just wanting an
explanation for what happened, and then eventually they don’t care about saving
themselves anymore but just want to prevent war between the indigenous sentient
life forms of Gaea.
And when they do finally get to the center
of Gaea, it is disappointingly anticlimactic. The entity at the center is a bit
annoying, frankly, and offers pretty contrived reasoning for why they were
captured, held, changed, stripped, and released. After the huge build-up of
their journey, the whole thing was hastily explained in a matter of fifteen or
so pages, and then everybody (or almost everybody) goes back to their preferred
homes with new-found celebrity status and lives happily ever after.
One aspect of the writing that didn’t help
is that descriptions of physical locations were sometimes very confusing. For
the most part, the writing was very straightforward, but during particularly
dramatic moments or crucial expository sections, settings suddenly became un-picturable.
For example:
The support cables came in rows of five
organized into groups of fifteen, and rows of three standing alone.
Each night region had fifteen cables
associated with it. There was a row of five vertical cables that went straight
up the hollow horn in the roof that was the inside of one of the spokes of Gaea’s
wheel. Two of these came to the ground in the highlands and were virtually a
part of the wall, one north and the other south. One emerged from a point
midway between the outermost cables, and the other two were spaced evenly
between the center and edge cables.
In addition to these central cables, the
night regions had two more rows of five that radiated from the spokes but
attached in daylight areas, one row twenty degrees east and the other twenty
degrees west of the central row. (Titan, Page
121)
I don’t think I should have to be a
geographer or an architect to be able to imagine this scene. Ringworld, too,
was an artificial ring-shaped habitat created by aliens, and had more diversity
of habitat on a much larger scale, but it was so vividly and clearly described
that I felt like I always could picture the environment and structure with no
problems—even the complicated side wall ports where ships docked and the suspended
sheets creating night and day.
And one other final peeve: it seemed that in the
sections of the book where the plot was laboring the hardest, Varley would slip
into expressing his characters’ emotions through overdramatic physical actions
that human beings don’t often really do. People chewed on their knuckles; they palmed,
slammed, or slapped control panel buttons; they variously hit their palm on a
bed, smacked a tree with the palm of their hand, and hit their forehead with
the heel of their hand; and, of course, they bit their lips and their tongues.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)