Ed Lacy
1957
Awards: Edgar
Rating: ★ ★ ★ ★ –
This novel just goes to show that you can’t judge a book by its ridiculous cover – or its teensy size.
It
proves that just because a book is short (a tidy 128 pages) and just
because it went out of print and had to be resurrected by a tiny
publisher who obviously scanned in the original text and then didn’t
edit it afterwards so that there are typos, skipped sentences, and
"& pound; s" scattered throughout the text, and whose extensive
cover design consisted of reprinting a tiny picture of the original 1957
cover artwork (shown here) surrounded by an enormous plain black
border, and who jammed the text so close to the tops of the pages that
the headers and page numbers are practically cut off, doesn’t mean it
can’t be action-packed and establish great characters.
The plot
is tried-and-true mystery fare: the main character, Toussaint Moore, is a
New York detective hired to track a man who quickly winds up being
murdered. Moore is the first to find the body and is of course
mistakenly accused of the crime; he then has to solve the murder in
order to prove his own innocence.
I loved Moore’s style. He
doesn’t take any guff and doesn’t go out of his way to make other people feel
comfortable. He is abrupt, snappy, and slangy, like Raymond Chandler's Philip Marlowe at his best. But Moore is also human, and his
fears are plain.
Lacy’s writing is fast-paced, clear-headed, and
straightforward–which is the only way the book can be this complex and
this short and still work. I liked that he starts by dropping you right
smack in the middle of the story, so you have to put the background
together for yourself as he gives it to you. And what I liked even more
was that you got the clues and solved the mystery at the same time Moore
does. It seems like this might make it less suspenseful, but it actually makes it more so.
What makes this novel unique for 1957 is that
Moore is black. (He is, in fact, described on the back of my copy of
the book and in several reviews as “the first credible black detective” in popular mystery fiction.)
For Moore,
a black detective in the ‘50s, racism is never far away. Especially
when most of the people he has to deal with in the story are white,
including the people who hired him, the police who are chasing him, and
the man he was trailing and is accused of murdering. This is a constant
additional tension, to say the least, that a white detective would not
have had to cope with.
In the course of solving the crime, Moore
ends up traveling from New York to Bingston, Ohio, a small town just
north of the Kentucky border. The contrast is educational for him.
Bingston is plainly, overtly racist; Moore can only make phone calls
from certain gas stations, can't eat at the cafeteria or stay at the
hotel, and is constantly called “boy” and treated with hostility.
New
York is certainly better than Bingston on the surface; black people have a wider choice
of professions, have at least the legal right
to eat and lodge anywhere they want, and night clubs often have both
black and white patrons. (It even has out-of-the-closet Lesbians
(capitalized), whom, by the way, Moore is totally okay with.)
But even with
the most “liberal-minded” white New Yorkers, Moore constantly walks a
tightrope of behavior, judging when to put up with insensitive remarks
or outright insults and when to defend himself. And he still has to
fight the pressure, even from his girlfriend and his own pesky
conscience, to give up his risky detective agency venture and run to a
safe civil service job.
An earlier version of this review originally appeared on Cheeze Blog.
Friday, March 5, 2021
Friday, January 8, 2021
Book Review: The Hours Before Dawn
Celia Fremlin
1958
Awards: Edgar
Rating: ★ ★ ★ ★ –
This was an unexpectedly enjoyable and well-crafted book. It was scary and suspenseful but also funny. And it did not disappoint at the end.
The book takes place in 1950s London. The main character is Louise, a harried housewife and mother with a new baby who can never get enough sleep so she is constantly tired and making mistakes and losing things (including her baby).
To earn some extra money, Louise and her husband take in a boarder who appears at first to be a mild-mannered schoolmistress but who becomes more and more sinister throughout the story.
I love the way Fremlin writes: very matter-of-fact-ly. She is sympathetic to Louise and her family but also shows their faults. She has surrounded Louise with neighbors and "friends" who constantly gossip and criticize and offer advice, but who never are actually any help. Among the "friends" are some "progressive" mothers who advocate the latest in child care (which in the '50s apparently means being as uninvolved as possible and leaving it up to your neighbors to feed and entertain your children). It all creates a perfectly crafted atmosphere of stress and chaos that makes Louise feel like she's going off her rocker.
Many of the Edgar award winners I have read start out strong, with a great and original idea, but then falter. This one does not have a super-original plot, but it was engrossing and satisfying right up to the very last sentence.
An earlier version of this review originally appeared on Cheeze Blog.
1958
Awards: Edgar
Rating: ★ ★ ★ ★ –
This was an unexpectedly enjoyable and well-crafted book. It was scary and suspenseful but also funny. And it did not disappoint at the end.
The book takes place in 1950s London. The main character is Louise, a harried housewife and mother with a new baby who can never get enough sleep so she is constantly tired and making mistakes and losing things (including her baby).
To earn some extra money, Louise and her husband take in a boarder who appears at first to be a mild-mannered schoolmistress but who becomes more and more sinister throughout the story.
I love the way Fremlin writes: very matter-of-fact-ly. She is sympathetic to Louise and her family but also shows their faults. She has surrounded Louise with neighbors and "friends" who constantly gossip and criticize and offer advice, but who never are actually any help. Among the "friends" are some "progressive" mothers who advocate the latest in child care (which in the '50s apparently means being as uninvolved as possible and leaving it up to your neighbors to feed and entertain your children). It all creates a perfectly crafted atmosphere of stress and chaos that makes Louise feel like she's going off her rocker.
Many of the Edgar award winners I have read start out strong, with a great and original idea, but then falter. This one does not have a super-original plot, but it was engrossing and satisfying right up to the very last sentence.
An earlier version of this review originally appeared on Cheeze Blog.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)